Underage Consumption > Can a Minor Refuse a Breath Test in Minnesota?

What are the most important underage drinking laws in Minnesota?  Can police force a minor consumption suspect to blow into a breath test machine?  The three biggest legal problems for those underage are:  (1) underage consumption; (2) minor in possession of alcohol; and, (3) underage drinking and driving (“not a drop”)

Underage drinking and driving

Minnesota underage drinking laws: Can a minor consumption suspect refuse a breath test?

Minnesota underage drinking laws: Can a minor consumption suspect refuse a breath test?

The most important of the underage drinking laws is the “not a drop” underage drink and drive law.

If a person is driving a motor vehicle in Minnesota, a police officer can invoke legal authority under a Minnesota Statute to demand a breath sample for a Portable (or Preliminary) Breath Test (“PBT”) machine.

If the driver refuses, the statute then authorizes arrest for suspicion of DWI.

What about drivers under age 21?  Under 21, any alcohol consumption and driving is a crime.  It’s a crime in Minnesota even without impairment, even below the legal limit for adults.

Minor Consumption (not driving or in a car)  

What about the person under 21 years of age, who is not driving or anywhere near a motor vehicle?  

There are no underage drinking laws that require that young person to provide a breath sample, away from a car. 

An odor of an alcoholic beverage does not allow police to require a breath test.  This is true when walking down the street, or at a house party.

Police cannot require a breath test

A young person in this position can simply refuse to consent to such a search.  Refusal to blow into a PBT does not allow police to arrest a pedestrian (unlike some drivers).  Underage drinking laws don’t give police legal authority to demand a breath test.

The Minnesota DWI Statute on Preliminary Screening Tests does authorize use of these in underage consumption cases in court.  But it does not authorize police to “require” a breath sample for a PBT where the person has no connection to a motor vehicle.

A recent case in Michigan illustrates some of the key points.  Troy v Chowdhury, Michigan Court of Appeals, September 10, 2009.  The City of Troy had enacted an ordinance to allow police to force consent to breath testing of minors.

The court struck down the underage drinking law as unconstitutional.  There, police did not claim to have consent from the accused, nor did they have a search warrant.  The court also confirms the obvious – when police take a breath sample that is a search.

Don’t “consent” to a pedestrian breath test

Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, police must have a search warrant, or a recognized exception to the warrant requirement.

Consent can be an exception.  If police coerce “consent,” then it is not consent.  But be sure to avoid any consent.  And ideally say “I do not consent!”

I know of no Minnesota statute or local ordinance that gives police authority to “require” a breath sample for alcohol testing (unless in connection with a carry weapon permit or motor vehicles). 

Police will often seek actual consent.  Or police try to coerce “consent.”  If police request a breath test, you do not have to consent to the search or provide a breath sample.

The police and local prosecutors can still charge underage consumption crimes without PBT evidence, based upon other available evidence.  (The most damning are verbal admissions by the accused.)

Regardless, you’ll have a stronger defense if you refuse to blow, and refuse to talk.

Minor in possession of alcohol

Know your rights: minor in possession, minor consumption

Know your rights: minor in possession, minor consumption

A related legal problem for people under 21 is a Minor in Possession charge.

Now that Minnesota’s underage drinking laws set the drinking age at 21, it’s really a underage possession of alcohol charge.  Since a “minor” becomes an adult at age 18, that is a more accurate name.

Defenses to a minor in possession charge includes those for any kind of criminal possession charge.  What evidence does the government have of “possession?”

Most police contacts happen with drivers and motor vehicles.  Therefore keeping contraband, including alcohol, out of the car is a basic precaution.  If in a car, at least in the trunk police won’t see it “in plain sight.”  And of course, the Open Bottle law applies to underage people just as must as to adults.

For pedestrians, defensive measures include refusing any breath test, and avoiding talking about it at all.

Other potential legal problems

Other associated problems include the crimes of giving false information or identity to police, and less often, fleeing.  No Minnesota law that requires a person to identify themselves to police, with few exceptions.  Exceptions include driving, hunting, carry permit, etc. 

If a person is not driving, they need not carry a drivers license or other ID.

But avoid giving a false identity to police, which is a worse crime than underage drinking, in the eyes of most.

If a police officer tells you to stop, fleeing is a crime in Minnesota, whether in a vehicle or otherwise.  And it’s a more serious crime than minor consumption, minor in possession, or other violations of underage drinking laws.

Asserting your legal rights

You need to stick up for yourself and assert your rights.  What is a legal right?  It’s yours.  It belongs to you.  But like anything that belongs to you, you can throw it away.  You can give it up, or give it away foolishly.  Don’t do that.

Get your back up.  Assert your rights.  If you can’t do it with inner confidence, at least look confident about it.

Next, as long as you remember to assert your rights fully, you will have them.  And you can do so politely.  In fact, if you assert your rights in a polite but firm way, you’ll appear more confident.

Know your rights.  And protect yourself from police and the government.

In general, police cannot compel a person suspected of a crime to talk or provide information.  And police cannot force a person to consent to a search.  You should avoid doing either.  However, any information you do provide should be truthful.  Tip: you can’t lie if you say nothing. 

Liberty-Lawyer.com logo sm wideWhen in doubt, seek legal advice from a lawyer before making a statement or consenting to a search.

Author: Thomas Gallagher Minneapolis Criminal Lawyer

6 responses to “Underage Consumption > Can a Minor Refuse a Breath Test in Minnesota?

  1. Nice neat and concise blog. I know Tom Gallagher from the garbage burner battles of the ’80’s. Also, he represented a friend of mine who was busted for having some weed in his car and he did a great job in advising and guiding the pot head through the process and made certain that he was hooded before hung. Great work for you know who Tom.
    In friendship,
    Leslie Davis Republic(m)an for Governor 2010

  2. What about a 19 year old who is a passenger in a car? The driver is also 19 and is given breathalyzer and blows 00 but officer suspects is under influence and gives driver a field sobriety test? Tells the passenger he must submit to breathalyzer test or go to jail. Passenger blows .009 so is given a ticket for underage consumption. Was it legal for the officer to make psgr submit to breathalyzer or tell him he will go to jail if he refuses?

    • No fact mentioned here would support arrest of the passenger. Police cannot lawfully require a passenger to blow into a PBT, according to the Minnesota Statute authorizing PBT requests ( https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=169A.41 ). It might be possible that the police officer observed some other fact not mentioned here that would justify arrest. The passenger would be in a better position to know whether or not that was the case. Although PBT evidence is not required for an underage consumption prosecution (other evidence may be used), an alcohol level of .009 is very close to .000; and, a significant percentage of the population has natural digestive fermentation that results in lifelong, low level of alcohol in their blood – even though they did not drink any alcohol. If the passenger admitted drinking alcohol, however, that could be enough evidence for prosecution (unless there is an affirmative defense: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=340A.503 ). All of this discussion relates to Minnesota only, not the laws of any other state or jurisdiction.

  3. Pingback: Legal First Aid: Protect Yourself from The Police and the Government - Minneapolis Criminal Law News

  4. Pingback: Know Your Rights: Protect Yourself from The Police - MN Criminal Lawyer

What do you think? Leave a Comment